Wed, 02:44 11 Mar 2009 GMT17

 
UK proposes fund to protect poor from credit crunch
09 Mar 2009 19:19:00 GMT
Written by: Emma Batha

Britain unveiled plans on Monday for an international multi-billion dollar fund to help the world's most vulnerable people through the global financial crisis as economic meltdown threatens to tip another 90 million into poverty.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown hopes to win backing for the proposal at next month's G20 meeting of industrialised and developing nations, which London is hosting.

Brown also promised the G20 summit would "crack down on tax havens that siphon off money from developing countries - money that could otherwise be spent on mosquito nets, vaccinations, economic development and jobs".

The proposed $5-6 billion rapid response safety-net fund will be administered by the World Bank.

"Too often in the past our responses to such crises have been inadequate or misdirected, promoting economic orthodoxies that we ourselves have not followed and that have condemned the world's poorest to a deepening cycle of poverty," Brown said.

"But this fund will be targeted at the very poorest, helping to keep girls in school, keep food on the table and keep poverty from the door so that when growth returns, people are in a position to contribute to the economy once more."

Brown was speaking at an international development conference in London attended by experts from 40 countries, including international economists, scientists and aid agencies.

British International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander said new estimates suggest the current crisis could set back the fight against extreme poverty by up to three years, with the number of people living on around a dollar a day or less growing by millions every week.

The proposed fund will target the most vulnerable groups including women, children, the disabled and elderly. It will offer basic services, such as feeding children and medical care for pregnant women, and will invest in initiatives to get people back into jobs, including food for work projects.

"If developing countries are less affected by the immediate fallout of the credit crunch, they may be more vulnerable to the second wave of what has been called a once-in-a-century credit tsunami," Alexander told the conference.

"And for the poorest people in the least developed countries, this is a crisis upon a crisis," he said, pointing out that it comes on top of last year's food price hikes, which trapped as many as 130 million in poverty.

"The human cost of this global recession will be real - by the end of next year we could see 90 million more people living in poverty," he said.

Alexander said the fund would be supported by a new global poverty alert system that would link international organisations, aid agencies and research groups into a single network providing instant updates on the impact of the economic crisis.

The system, which would include real-time updates using text messaging and emails, would enable money to be targeted faster and more effectively.

Although many developing countries were not impacted in the same way as the United States and Europe in the early stages of the global downturn, Alexander said there were growing signs a devastating knock-on effect was on its way.

He said it would be the poorest who would be hit hardest as world trade shrank, private sector investment slowed down and the flow of cash from family members abroad dried up.
  • Private capital flows to developing countries are likely to fall from $1 trillion two years ago to less than $200 billion this year.
  • Remittances to many countries globally worth as much as $280 billion a year are starting to fall as workers who migrated to the West find it harder to send money home. Remittances are worth three times as much to developing countries as global aid.
  • World trade could shrink this year for the first time in more than 25 years, meaning job losses and falling demand for commodities. Up to 300,000 miners in the Democratic Republic of Congo are already reported to have lost their jobs.
Alexander promised Britain would keep its promise to raise aid levels to 0.7 percent of GDP by 2013 and said other leading nations must do the same. He also promised new action to improve trade, tackle climate change and stop conflict in fragile states.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

2 responses to “UK proposes fund to protect poor from credit crunch”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Muthyavan. says:

    UK proposal to help poor people in the third wold countries out of the present economic crisis is good and needs backing from all other G 20 nations with more money to the 90 million bail out plan. There should be more guide lines directing the funds to the various local banks in poor countries so that any needy applicant will be able to apply individually and obtain help by passing all corrupted practices enforced normally.

    When world economy is faced with its first international dawn turn in the last eighty years it is the duty of the G20 rich nations to extend its hand of help toward the poor peoples of the world. When UK which is also badly hit by the crisis was able to announce 90 million other rich countries also could ad up by hundreds of millions to these funds soon.

    In many poor countries Mobile text phones messages are making great impact on villagers in their daily transactions and it will be a very good idea to implement helping poor people by these crash loans. It should also be designed in eliminating all frauds and corrupted practice so that only the needy will get the money from institutions.

  2. Mike says:

    The proposal is kind-hearted but fails to answer questions that civilians in the "rich" nations may have for this. What about the growing numbers of poor people in each country? Isn't the first job of any government to help it's own people? How much aid can we truly even promise these other countries when we cannot even stabilize our economies long enough to generate job growth? Now, I am not saying that we shouldn't help people who need it as we can, but I think that at some point we have to assign resources based on where they are most likely to generate the best results. Pumping billions of dollars into countries with no hope of paying it back simply because we feel bad for their situation may make us feel better but leave us worse off for the wear. Just a thought.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Emma Batha joined AlertNet in 2005 after four years on the Reuters international editing desk in London. She has previously worked as a reporter on the South China Morning Post in Hong Kong and was Asia Pacific editor at BBC News Online.

Related articles

Breaking stories
INTERVIEW-WFP plans global fund to pre-buy food stocks

Africa DR Congo: Militia Leader Guilty in Landmark Trial

AlertNet insight
Africa UK proposes fund to protect poor from credit crunch

Aid agency news feed
oIt is now more dangerous to be a woman than to be a soldier in modern conflicto

Blogs
Africa Back in the bush

Maps
Americas MAP: Global projected land use changes, 1700-2050


Background information



URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/an_art/19216/2009/02/9-191958-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org