MEDIAWATCH: Destabilisation threatens the north Caucasus
Written by: Joanne Tomkinson

Women stand with a poster which reads "Give Our Sons Back!" as they rally in the city of Nazran in Ingushetia, September 19, 2007.
REUTERS/Said Tsarnayev/Files (RUSSIA)
REUTERS/Said Tsarnayev/Files (RUSSIA)
Has Russia finally defeated Chechnya's separatist insurgents at the same time as another major conflict is brewing in the volatile north Caucasus region? Press coverage of Chechnya, and its neighbours Ingushetia and Dagestan, raises questions about balance between peace and conflict in the whole area. "Like it or not, Russia has won this war," says Jonathan Steele of the 17-year-old conflict between Moscow and Chechnya, in Britain's Guardian newspaper. Russian troops are no longer seen on the region's streets, the Chechen police force is itself capable of dealing with security, and the previously war-torn capital Grozny has been transformed by considerable investment since President Ramzan Kadyrov's came to power in April 2007, Steele writes. The dreams of Chechen independence, if not completely dead and buried, are for now at least, on ice, he writes. With normal life resumed in Chechnya, Grozny is now almost unrecognisable, Britain's Independent newspaper says, pointing to the scale of recovery in the region. "Peace and economic recovery seem to be keeping separatist yearnings at bay," the paper writes. The New York Times, however, draws a different conclusion about the status of the Chechen insurgency. Increasing attacks on the families of suspected insurgents indicate that there is still a "small but smouldering insurgency fighting for Chechnya's independence from Russia", according to the paper. Over a dozen homes of the families of those suspected of joining the insurgency have been burnt to the ground over the summer as part of a targeted arson campaign, the paper reports. The level of information shaping the attacks suggests that the arsonists are members of the Chechen police forces, according to the paper, though the government denies involvement. The New York Times says the insurgency has weakened since 2005, but that it's clear "the rebels have proven resilient and remain able to recruit new members". Elsewhere in the north Caucasus the warnings are more alarming. "The talk of peace and reconciliation (in Chechnya) is in stark contrast to the rest of the region. In neighbouring Ingushetia violence is on the rise," says Britain's Times newspaper. Other commentators go further. "Now Russia's war in Georgia may have triggered a new cycle of repression and resistance," the Economist magazine says. And it's Chechnya's immediate neighbours that are the cause for real concern. "Dagestan is increasingly ungovernable and violent," the magazine says. "Ingushetia itself is close to boiling point." Islamist militants have moved to Ingushetia from Chechnya and civilians are increasingly caught in the cross-fire between separatists and the area's authorities, according to the magazine. Reuters, meanwhile, reports that increasing violence and clashes in Ingushetia threaten to destabilise the whole of the north Caucasus. Gunshots, bomb attacks, murders and kidnappings are a daily part of life in Ingushetia's biggest town Nazran, according to the news agency. Heavy-handed tactics and widespread unemployment and poverty are said to be fuelling a popular uprising. These clashes aren't just a local problem, Reuters says. They could spread to other parts of the north Caucasus, and threaten to re-ignite an ethnic conflict with neighbouring North Ossetia.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.




