U.N. vows to stay in NW Pakistan despite deadly attack
Written by: Nita Bhalla

UNICEF's chief of education in Pakistan, Perseveranda So, speaks in this undated handout released on June 10, 2009. So was killed in a bomb attack on the Pearl Continental Hotel in the northern city of Peshawar on June 9, 2009.
REUTERS/UNICEF/Handout
REUTERS/UNICEF/Handout
NEW DELHI - The United Nations has no plans to suspend or reduce its activities in Pakistan despite Tuesday's bomb attack that killed nine people, including two foreign U.N. staff, in the northern city of Peshawar, U.N. agencies say. Pakistan is grappling with one of the world's biggest humanitarian emergencies, with more than two million people uprooted by a military offensive to expel Taliban militants in the northwest Swat valley. In the past few weeks, hundreds of aid groups have deployed in the volatile region to assist displaced civilians who need shelter, food, water and medicine. On Wednesday, U.N. agencies issued statements saying five workers were among the nine people who died in the assault on the Pearl Continental hotel, a favourite with foreigners. Those killed were a Philippine woman who had worked for the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) for 15 years, a Serbian man on his first emergency mission with the U.N. Refugee Agency (UNHCR), and three Pakistani U.N. employees. There have been media reports, including in Britain's Guardian and Financial Times newspapers, that the United Nations had ordered staff to evacuate from Peshawar. But Manuel Bessler, head of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in Islamabad, told AlertNet the United Nations will not pull out from or scale down its activities in Peshawar, where it provides aid to about 200,000 displaced civilians. "We are not even thinking about withdrawing or scaling down," he said. "We are fully involved in responding to the important humanitarian needs of the people, and we are convinced and committed to continue." UNHCR says it has temporarily relocated many staff to Islamabad - about two hours' drive away - for rest and counselling in the wake of the attack, but is not evacuating its personnel. Some employees remain in Peshawar and aid operations are continuing. "We have a lot of staff (there) - both national and international - and we have possibly millions of people in need, so we have to maintain our presence," said Peter Kessler, a London-based spokesperson for the agency. UNICEF also said it has no intention of evacuating its staff or cutting back its programmes. SAFETY REVIEW Aid workers are struggling to deal with the massive scale of the crisis in Pakistan, where they face not only a severe shortage of funds but an increasingly insecure operating environment. Under pressure from the sustained military offensive in the north, Taliban insurgents have vowed retaliation, and there has been a string of attacks across the country. In the latest attack on the Peshawar hotel, where around a dozen U.N. staff were staying, militants shot their way into the forecourt and exploded a truck bomb in front of the lobby. The United Nations has several hundred national and international staff working in Pakistan. Bessler said that, while their safety is of the utmost importance, U.N. agencies cannot afford to stop providing relief to those affected by the upsurge in fighting. The United Nations is currently reassessing its security arrangements in Pakistan, and staff in the country, as well as at head offices in New York and Geneva, have been holding emergency meetings to discuss safety. UNHCR has sent a team to Pakistan, including specialists in security and trauma, to explore what adjustments should be made to the way it works following the bombing. UNICEF is also considering how to improve safety. "We are looking again - as much as one possibly can - to tighten security," said Patrick McCormick, UNICEF's deputy head of communications in New York. "But as we all know, the best security in the world is no defence against determined suicide bombers." OCHA's Bessler said the United Nations wants the Pakistani government to help ensure the safety of its staff and operations. Potential measures include beefing up security personnel at distribution points and patrols in areas where aid groups are working. "We are not looking for armed escorts, just an environment that allows for a more secure performance for the delivery of humanitarian assistance," he said. (Additional reporting by Megan Rowling in London)
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.





