Thu Sep 27 07:47:07 200717

Fetching...
 
Why is Hugo Chavez's face on tuna fish cans for Peruvian quake survivors?
21 Aug 2007 17:13:00 GMT
Blogged by: Megan Rowling
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez attends his weekly broadcast "Alo Presidente" in Caracas, August 19, 2007. REUTERS/Miraflores Palace/Handout
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez attends his weekly broadcast "Alo Presidente" in Caracas, August 19, 2007. REUTERS/Miraflores Palace/Handout
A humanitarian crisis is a great excuse for a few rounds of political point-scoring. And last week's massive earthquake in Peru has proved to be no exception.

It isn't so unusual for donors to stamp their mark on food aid, but thousands of cans of tuna reportedly distributed in the Peruvian quake zone south of Lima appear to have taken the practice to a new level.

Peru's Expreso newspaper carries a photo of a tin with a label sporting photos of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Peruvian opposition politician Ollanta Humala, who lost to Alan Garcia in last year's presidential election.

According to a report in the Los Angeles Times, a message on the label reads: "The Peruvian government acts in an inefficient, slow and heartless manner, notwithstanding the pain of the victims, leaving them to the mercy of hunger, thirst and delinquency."

Not surprisingly, the offending cans have stirred up a political storm.

Humala's Nationalist Party - whose logo also features on the label - has denied responsibility, blaming a "weak and cowardly" campaign to damage its image, according to the Miami Herald. President Garcia said he didn't believe Humala was behind the fishy propaganda. But the Expreso newspaper said the cans were handed out from Nationalist Party trucks, fuelling the theory they could be the brainchild of local Humala or Chavez supporters.

The Venezuelan ambassador to Peru was quick to disassociate his government from the controversial labels. "This is a damaging manipulation, a vile manipulation because Venezuela has brought humanitarian aid, not party politics," he reportedly told Lima's CPN Radio.

The LA Times said the row was symptomatic of a wider divide between South Americans who support the policies of powerful socialist leader Chavez and those who disapprove of his anti-U.S. rhetoric.

President Garcia is a Washington ally who has accused his Venezuelan counterpart of interfering in Peru's affairs. During last year's presidential campaign, he also branded Humala "a Chavez lackey", according to the newspaper. But while there's no love lost between Garcia and Chavez, the Peruvian president has publicly thanked Venezuela for the quake aid it's sent.

As long as the perpetrators of "tuna-gate" remain shrouded in mystery, it's hard to know whether the cans were a roaring a success or a political own-goal.

Either way, the controversy makes Bolivian President Evo Morales look like a saint in comparison. He and his cabinet have promised to donate between 25 percent and half of their pay this month to the tens of thousands of families left homeless by the devastating Peru quake.

"International aid is not always enough when there is a natural disaster, but a small contribution will always help the families affected by the earthquake," Morales said.

Big natural disasters can make or break governments. They can make a town mayor a hero who'll go on to be president, or they can expose the faultlines of state corruption and fuel a revolution.

Sometimes tragedies persuade long-standing enemies to unite and help each other out. Other times governments score goals by giving aid to traditional enemies to highlight their weakness.

In the case of Peru, some quake survivors have got so fed up waiting for help to arrive that they've packed up and left town. According to a report in the Christian Science Monitor, aid workers say there's actually plenty of relief to go round, but the problem lies with distribution bottlenecks.

Some have criticised a decision to put ministers in charge of the relief effort. "Local authorities, the ones who know the area best, and titular head of the civil defense system, have no role. They have been replaced by ministers," Frank Boeren of Oxfam International told the paper.

To those still waiting for relief to trickle through, the tuna scandal must seem like a cruel and cynical sideshow.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Delicio.us  |   Digg  |   NewsVine  |   Reddit                                                                                  Permalink

7 responses to “Why is Hugo Chavez's face on tuna fish cans for Peruvian quake survivors?”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Jose A. Villa says:

    Hugo Chavez once again is trying to assert his influence by involving himself in the politics of foreign governments.He gives money at the expense of the Venezuelan people because in Venezuela crime and unemployment is out of control and the countries infrastructure is falling apart.This donkey thinks like his pimp Fidel in trying to take over latin America and maybe the world.He was caught meeting with an individual that was later arrested with 800,000 dollars in Argentina.The donkey ass thinks he can influence the election in Argentina and take over the world.He must be arrested like Noriega for drug trafficing,etc.

  2. John Penta says:

    I could see local Chavez supporters being that over-the-top. I sincerely doubt it was Venezuela's idea, though. At the same time, it seems unlikely to be an opposition trick; the blowback would be too harsh if they were to be found out.

  3. Michael Gayer says:

    Like Fidel, Hugo thinks he is irrasistable to every Spanish speaking country in the Americas. He grows wealthy as his people slip into poverty. He and the Venezuelan Government would like you to think otherwise. Also Like Castro, Chavez wants all Latin America to be Communistic. Fight the right to be free and make your fortune. Capitolism is flawed, but it is better than no choice at all unless it is yes to the dictaitor. Under Communism you cannot get rid of a bad situation, under Freedom you can vote them out or through them out.

  4. Joel Stewart says:

    I agree with poster John Penta, this appears to be the work of local Nationalist supporters who lack a sophisticated understanding of how the broader world views this sort of primitive propaganda. Why are we even talking about Chavez, as if the caudillo himself were the very representation of the political needs that give him power? Why are we not talking about the perpetually unaddressed interests of the people of the world, whose lack of support for the multinational interests that betray them is not ultimately swayed by tuna can advertising, but rather by the very real conditions of their living environment?

  5. Juan Reynoso says:

    The use of people’s sentiments and poverty to gain political power is the work of communist and dictators. It is not a secret that Chaves and his followers will use the misfortune of a natural disaster or the extreme poverty in Peru to gain supporters and attack the principals of a free democracy and capitalism.

  6. Patricio Daly says:

    To Michael Gayer: I'm sorry to say you are prejudiced and probably ignore the Venezuela and Chavez situation. he is not a dictator, he was elected in democratic elections and US were implicated in a coup d'etat against him. I wouldn't be so proud if my democracy will do that. Unless I think it's my courtyard.

  7. Michael Gayer says:

    To Patricio Daly: You say I am prejudice and ignore Venezuela Situation. Yes I am when it comes to a dictator or someone that spits at freedom and human rights. In the past 12 months Chavez has saught to end Venezuelas Congress. Repeel human rights closed newspapers opposed to him and his doctrine. Waged aggression against free peoples of South America, supported anarchists and just been wrong. if you support him then fine, do so but do not tell me he is a good man. I have eyes and ears. I do not always believe what is written in Americas newspapers or on TV. Put in the rest of the world and you get a good picture of the man and his teachings.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.


URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/blogs/20316/2007/07/21-171339-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org