US: No Satire, No News
Written by: Andrew Stroehlein
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
Everyone who thought American television news couldn't get any worse has been proven wrong in recent weeks, as the writers' strike has shut down the satirical news shows where so many people get their news these days. Yes, it's not just drama and sit-coms that have been hit by the industrial action of the Writers Guild of America. Jon Stewart's Daily Show and Stephen Colbert's Colbert Report have also been in reruns since early November.
We're not talking about the loss of a couple comedy shows here. With the cliff-dive dumbing-down of US TV news over the last decade or so, these satirical news programs have become primary sources of information for millions of Americans in recent years -- particularly younger and more educated ones. The loss is felt, and there is a growing public debate about its impact on politics.
Monica Guzman of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer looks at the slump in ratings and asks: "As for the millions who say they get their news from these shows -- however brief and slanted (or surprisingly substantial) -- and those who rarely pick up a newspaper or read an article online, will they not only stop laughing, but also stop knowing?"
Matthew Felling, editor of the CBSNews.com daily blog Public Eye, emphasises the shows' importance in the overall news ecosystem of the US: "They gave the serious newspeople an out, an excuse -- the producers and anchors could run the material that said what they couldn't. They were the outsourcing of sanity and perspective in an all-too-often surreal and laughable political environment."
Felling thinks that in the absence of the satirists, American politicians are getting away with more, changing the tone of the 2008 presidential campaign. I would think that it is also warping coverage of foreign news and foreign policy, too, as these are areas where the two shows have been very strong, especially on Iraq.
Now, some readers of this blog who have criticised me for defending news satire before, may think I am over-reacting, but the impact of these shows is huge. Stewart and Colbert do not pull in top-level politicians as guests night after night because their shows are inconsequential. Without these programs, fewer necessary questions will be asked of those who are supposed to provide answers.
The sooner the writers' strike is over, the better for the American public debate on foreign policy and other political priorities. MoveOn.org has picked this up as a public campaign now, with a Facebook page and a petition. They put the blame squarely on the studios' shoulders: "The studios will make over $120 million in ad revenue this year showing TV programs on the web. But they want to give writers a one-time payment of $250 -- that's right, $250 -- for unlimited use of their content online. This unbelievable greed is keeping Jon Stewart and his team off the air."
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
1 response to “US: No Satire, No News”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.



Journalist Andrew Stroehlein is Director of Media and Information for the International Crisis Group, the conflict resolution organisation, where he promotes responsible coverage of current and potential conflicts and helps draw attention to forgotten wars around the world.
24 Jan 2008 08:57:42 GMT
Interesting article. Ask Swift's contemporaries if satire served a purpose. Of course they're dead now, so you can't, but it you could. . . . I'm trying to attract readers. Hope you'll check out my new website: http://newslampoon.com.
Thanks.