Czech Art Shocks Brussels
Written by: Andrew Stroehlein
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.

As I walked into the European Council building in Brussels for a pair of meetings yesterday, my eyes were led upward by multiple fingers pointing amidst audible breaths being drawn in to an enormous new art installation. Entropa depicts the EU as a build-it-yourself set of plastic parts, with each country represented by a blunt stereotype.
Italy is a football pitch, Germany a spread of autobahns in which those with the intention to do so might see a swastika, Sweden is wrapped up in a flat-pack Ikea box, and the UK, perceived as more eurosceptic than most, is noted by its complete absence. The Netherlands is under water apart from a few minarets, and in Poland, a Catholic clergy raises the gay rainbow flag.
The group I was with mostly laughed, getting the joke right away: we Europeans have such simplistic prejudices about each other -- and among ourselves within individual countries -- and Europe will not be built until these mental barriers really start coming down.
But many of those gasping at it clearly found it offensive, and it has sparked controversy in the media. Admittedly, Bulgaria, which comes off as a squat toilet, might have a bit more to gripe about than others.
And the Czechs, who currently hold the six-month rotating presidency and commissioned the work, were somewhat embarrassed when it emerged that the artist, David Cerny, had apparently scammed them, having initially told them the work was made by 27 EU artists when he created the whole thing himself. But, come on, Prague: you commissioned David Cerny -- what did you expect but controversy?
Even still, to me, it’s brilliant: great art, provoking some wonderful conversations and hopefully breaking people out of their day-to-day complacency. Once again, I am amazed people just don’t get humourous political art.
Let’s laugh a bit and admit the truth in this: here in Brussels we all hear the same kinds of national stereotypes coming from some of those who actually work in the EU institutions. Many people seem to ask almost as a matter of course what member state a person in a particular position in the system comes from, and then they immediately make sweeping judgements about how that person will respond to a request or explanations of behaviour in the style of, “ah, well, he’s from X, so that's why he's acting like that”. Then, a wave of knowing nods around the table. We have yet to make Europeans even among those most likely to feel comfortable with that identity.
At zije David Cerny!
(photo: Maite Morren)
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
3 responses to “Czech Art Shocks Brussels”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.





Journalist Andrew Stroehlein is Communications Director for the International Crisis Group, the conflict resolution organisation, where he promotes responsible coverage of current and potential conflicts and helps draw attention to forgotten wars around the world.
14 Jan 2009 12:24:32 GMT
Ah, yes, the old story of the 'provocative artist''awakening' us from our truly bourgeois lifes and 'confronting' us with our demons.
Actually, it is more a case of dissemination and reinforcement of old prejudices under cover of 'art' by attention seekers or profiteers with our without a hidden political agenda. Althought it may be a publicity stunt for those lacking capacity to generate real art. And usually, there is always a generous public sponsor and a chorus of 'intelectuals' echoing the prejudices -making sure they reach us instead of falling into oblivion once and forever, as it should be the case- while singing praise for the so-called 'artist' and its 'provocative' standing. Tiring, boring and quite decadent, actually.15 Jan 2009 16:39:34 GMT
I am an artist myself.
("Ah, yes, the old story of the 'provocative artist' 'awakening' us from our truly bourgeois lives and 'confronting' us with our demons." Yet another stereotype to be connected to this piece of artwork? I think this artist has clearly shown that he does not care a damn about what anyone else thinks or does. You can be sure, Mr Penya, that this man will not give a fiddle about awakening you to your demons.) The artwork itself is of a good standard - there is no doubt about it. Nor, do I think, should the artist be held responsible for following his own judgement (although personally I find it a little cheap for him to have scammed the commissioner of the work - not at all a practice of integrity). What is the issue in this case is that the artwork is, in part, a representative of a national government (commissioned & paid for by the Czech state) and was to be a GIFT to the European Union. Such a message has been thoroughly (&cleverly)twisted by the artist. A government should have been much more careful with, and have supervised more rigorously, a gesture of such diplomatic weight.16 Feb 2009 16:20:07 GMT
Hello:
Just a quick pass and I noticed this article. My dude friend is also an artist into what looks like here political art. Wow!..cool. Its nice to see folks are still strong enough to voice(OPINION) trends in power and control mechanisms. Just a thought. Seems the real fruit here is the response.