Impartial agencies should be allowed to distribute aid
Written by: Tim Costello
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
Imagine this: a massive cyclone sweeps up and over low-lying coastal areas, swamping homes and utterly transforming the landscape. Flooding wreaks havoc and days later whole regions remain inaccessible. The number of dead and missing rises dramatically every hour. The sheer volume of debris and destruction triggers feelings of hopelessness and despair - how to know where to start? Then in the country's hour of need, the government reaches out for help, and the world responds. More than 60 countries offer money, goods, and expertise to help the victims of the cyclone. This scenario is the story of the people of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. America has the world's largest economy, and extraordinary resources and infrastructure. But even the most equipped government could not possibly have anticipated the scale of the devastation wrought on New Orleans. Similarly, the scenes I am witnessing here in Myanmar have been dreadful. Enormous trees litter the roads and queues for fuel are four kilometres long, making travel in the country difficult. In the countryside, people are jammed into monasteries, school halls and any other buildings left standing. There they carve out a strip of floor where the remnants of their families huddle. On the road to Bogalay, I saw people camped by the roadside. Already there are signs of malaria and skin infections. Beyond those camps there are still people we have not reached seven days after the cyclone, a situation that leaves me feeling frustrated at the pace of assistance, and guilty knowing that more can be done. However, we are getting life-saving aid to people. Yesterday I attended two World Vision rice distributions on the outskirts of Yangon, each to more than 3,000 people. We are still able to purchase relief goods inside the country. What we must do now is turn this trickle of aid into a flood. The scale of this disaster would be beyond the capacity of authorities and local organisations in any country. Here in Yangon, I have witnessed both of those groups performing well - but there is simply more need than can be met. Already it is clear this disaster will have an impact on Myanmar the equal of anything witnessed in countries like Sri Lanka and Indonesia after the tsunami. In such circumstances, there are international conventions recognising that those affected by calamity are entitled to protection and assistance. Aid agencies are experts in providing that assistance. They have technical specialists in areas such as water and sanitation, shelter and health who are specially trained to respond effectively in large-scale disasters. However these staff, as well as cargo planes already loaded with essential items, have so far been unable to touch down and begin doing what they do best. A number of aid agencies like World Vision have a long history of development work in Myanmar. In a delicate political environment, they have maintained independence that has allowed them to work steadily to improve the lives of the poor. Aid agencies try to navigate the limited humanitarian space, in often challenging contexts, in order to fulfil their imperative to meet need. This desire to meet need is a message that I have tried to convey while I have been here. Impartiality is a fundamental principle of the humanitarian charter that governs major aid agencies. We seek to demonstrate this constantly in our work. For example, in Myanmar and elsewhere, agencies insist that if they fly aid into a country, they be allowed to distribute it as well. In the absence of clean water sources, the spectre of water-borne diseases is now the most urgent concern. There is stagnant water everywhere. As people become more desperate, dysentery, cholera and malaria could take many more lives. Movement throughout the southern delta region is extremely slow. Cyclone Nargis cut a broad swathe nearly 300 kilometres into Myanmar; by comparison the tsunami reached about three kilometres inland when it struck. Massive amounts of debris must be moved. Only then will any sort of assistance start to reach those who have been hardest hit. Temporary shelter needs to be set up to allow families some respite from the elements. There will be longer-term structural problems for the country as well. The Irrawaddy delta area was the rice bowl of the nation. It is now a devastated wasteland. The banks and levees are destroyed. Rice prices have doubled from 2,000 to 4,000 kyat. Migration, the legacy of losing breadwinners or parents, and the struggle to rebuild homes and livelihoods all lie ahead. With every day I spend here, my sense of urgency increases. There are thousands of people receiving aid every day, yet there are tens of thousands more still to be helped. The sight of so many people with out shelter or basic necessities is distressing. The work is urgent, the need great. As I write, there are hopeful signs of a breakthrough in discussions that will allow aid to start flowing into the country. But the clock is ticking in the race to save lives.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
1 response to “Impartial agencies should be allowed to distribute aid”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.



Tim Costello has been chief executive of international Christian aid agency World Vision Australia since 2004. Before that he campaigned and wrote books on issues such as gambling, urban poverty, homelessness, reconciliation and substance abuse, after being a Baptist minister. He was awarded the Australian medal Victorian of the Year in 2005, Victorian Australian of the Year in 2005, and in June 2005 was made an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO).
10 May 2008 12:03:41 GMT
Tim,
I'm intrigued to see your contrast with the U.S. government after Hurricane Katrina, since my memory is that they came under fairly heavy criticism - both for slow response and for reluctance to accept international aid. I'm not saying that was anything on the scale of the current stand-off in Myanmar, but I wouldn't hold it up as a paragon of best practice. Thanks for your vivid descriptions from Myanmar. Wishing you all the best with your work.