Tue, 11:05 12 Aug 2008 GMT17

 
Abkhazia's civilians, caught between two machine guns
15 Jul 2008 14:37:00 GMT
Written by: Nikolaj Nielsen
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
Mzevinari, an internally displaced woman in Georgia. PHOTO: Nikolaj Nielsen
Mzevinari, an internally displaced woman in Georgia. PHOTO: Nikolaj Nielsen

Mzevinari and her husband Guladi have lost all hope of ever returning home. The mountains of Abkhazia, only 5 km (3 miles) away from the tiny border town of Rukhi in the Caucasian nation of Georgia, loom omnipotent in the background. Their snowy peaks serve as constant reminders of an unreachable summit.

The longing to go back to Abkhazia - in the northwest of Georgia, on the Black Sea - is just as unattainable as a job and a proper roof. All are fond memories from another life, before 1992, when then Georgian President Eduard Shevardnazde started a war with Abkhazia to quell talk of separatism.

Both sides committed atrocities in the fighting which followed, and several thousand people are believed to have been killed. The Abkhazians eventually pushed out the Georgian troops the following year, with the help of Chechens and Russians - who simultaneously armed the Georgians.

Following the war, some 270,000 Georgians living in Abkhazia fled to Georgia, according to the United Nations. However, the numbers are contested since they're based on a population census by Tbilisi's authorities, which counted a pre-war community of 540,000.

In 1994, Russia, Georgia, Abkhazia and the U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) agreed to cooperate on planning the repatriation of people who fled the conflict zone, but it's had limited success so far.

Many of the people displaced within Georgia have blood on their hands from a time when neighbours turned on neighbours. Others, innocent of any crime, simply fled out of fear of violent Abkhaz retribution. "When Tbilisi sent in troops, many Georgians in Abkhazia joined and took up arms against neighbours, sometimes even against relatives via intermarriage," says Dr. Viacheslav Chirikba, president of the Foundation for Independent Expertise in Sokhumi, a non-governmental research institute in the town claimed as the capital of independent Abkhazia.

In Zugdidi, Georgia, a displaced Georgian woman who works for an international organisation and wishes to remain unnamed said Abkhaz militias shot her uncle's wife in front of her children. "You can't forget these kinds of things," she added.

When Georgian partisans tried to liberate the Abkhazian district of Gali in a two-week war in 1998, more than half of homes there were destroyed. Around 40,000 Georgian refugees fled a second time, Belgian-based think tank International Crisis Group says. But people are returning, driven by their families, their property and their memories.

The tension hasn't gone away, and there's been a spate of bombings lately. On July 6 a bomb attack on a cafe in Gali town centre killed four people and injured six, the worst violence in months. Everyone is on edge.

Georgia has dramatically increased its military expenditure. In March, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili said Georgia had 33,000 serving troops and another 100,000 reservists. Russia is moving in more peacekeeping forces and Abkhazia's military is on alert. Everyone is combat ready.

Abkhazia, once an autonomous soviet socialist republic within Georgia during the time of Josef Stalin - who was himself Georgian - seeks independence and recognition as a people with a distinct culture, heritage, history, and language. Georgia wants Abkhazia back. Neither is willing to concede.

Russia has its own interest, capitalising on controlled instability in a region that complicates Georgia's desired adhesion to NATO and forces Abkhazia to rely on its largest neighbour.

UNHCR estimates that there were still more than 220,000 internally displaced people in Georgia in 2006.

The displaced families are caught in the crossfire, especially tens of thousands of Georgian "returnees" living in the Gali district, a territory in eastern Abkhazia under its de facto jurisdiction. They're estimated at between 45,000 to 50,000 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, but nobody knows exactly as UNHCR has yet to verify numbers in the volatile zone.

Gali is the only region, out of seven in Abkhazia, where refugees from Georgia are allowed to return and settle. They are for the most part ethnic Mingrelian and have experienced human rights abuse from Georgians, Abkhazians, and from an assortment of local militias.

Abkhazians pressure them to join the military and to take Abkhaz citizenship - sometimes through threats and intimidation. "I am not saying we are altruistic to these people," says Abkhazia's de facto deputy minister of foreign affairs. "They can get Abkhazian citizenship and must refrain from getting Georgian. I understand it is ambiguous, but this is our position."

Russian peacekeepers at checkpoints extort money from the hazelnut and citrus fruit farmers transporting their goods to Zugdidi market across the ceasefire line.

While Abkhazia declared its independence in 1994, it remains unrecognised by the international community and its status has never been resolved. Aside from enjoying normal trade and transport relations with Russia, it's struggling under an economic embargo and poverty levels are very high.

In Abkhazia, Guladi was working as a lorry driver and Mzevinari a housewife. They now receive a combined total of 80 Georgian laris ($57) per month, a meagre government stipend for internally displaced people that's meant to supplement an income that neither one has and to feed their two children.

Mzevinari, an outspoken mother in her fifties, wants the roof repaired as she stares at a large pool of water on the floor of her living room which at one time was a small department store. The entire back wall is covered in green mould and webbed in blackened rivulets of rainwater. "The roof starting going about five years ago," she says, "and for the past few months it's gotten really bad."

Mzevinari's story and living conditions are not unlike those of some 40,000 other internally displaced people currently living in Zugdidi and its environs. In Zugdidi proper, 150 families live in an abandoned former public hospital. Some live six or seven to a room and one family I met has no electricity.

The conflict, filtered through the spectrum of Georgia as victim of a bullying Russia, obfuscates Tbilisi's less than stunning performance of democracy, its ill treatment of displaced people, and indeed its aggressive posture against Abkhazia.

As is so often the case, the real victims are those simply trying to get by, not concerned with decision-making in the upper echelons of government, but rather on when and if electricity will return and how to patch a leaking roof.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   

7 responses to “Abkhazia's civilians, caught between two machine guns”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. David Tsanava says:

    Mengrelians are Georgians I am one of them and when you publish "They are for the most part ethnic Mingrelian and have experienced human rights abuse from Georgians, Abkhazians" you are wrong becuase again I repeat Mingrelians are Georgians and Abkhazs are not.

  2. большая четверка says:

    It is wery impotent problem in the Europe.

  3. Oteller says:

    Abkhazia is near of us. from border city of turkey to Abkhazia . its very big problem . lot of people coming here for earning money from there even if some of them doctor. i wish they turn to old days

  4. Dominik Olewinski says:

    Articles should be based on verified information and not blank statements. Regrettably, this piece evidences lack of awareness of the nature of the conflicts in the Caucasus and insufficient research. First of all, singling out Mingrelians as non-Georgians is quite a rude mistake which supposedly equals that of calling New Yorkers non-Americans. Secondly, by stressing that Stalin was Georgian the impression is created as if he favoured Georgia related policies. The author should have read more on the issue. Stalin's purges were unprecedented in Georgia. Regarding territories, Stalin tore Georgia apart, granting Georgian town Sochi to Russia and creating Ossetian and Abkhazian autonomies on the terriotry that has never been defined as any other land than Georgia. So in this case, thanks to Stalin Abkhazs and Ossetians for the first time in history obtained their own "republics". Thirdly, it is of interest where the author obtained information regarding Russians providing arms to Georgians? That is a very strong statement and needs to be sourced in order to be believed. ! As for the fact whether Georgia is bullied by Russia or not, the author should read more about the recent violations of Georgian air space by the Russian planes and the related discussions held at the UN security council which highly condemned the named facts. Overall, although an effort has been made to analyse the situation in the region, unprofessionalism and unverified information devaluated the arguments of the author.

  5. Nikolaj Nielsen says:

    Thank for your comments and the questions you raised. I would like to address these issues.

    1. Mingrelians

    I realize this is a sensitive topic but at no point do I claim Mingrelians are not Georgians.

    I write that the people living in Gali are Georgian “returnees.”

    “The displaced families are caught in the crossfire, especially tens of thousands of Georgian "returnees" living in the Gali district, a territory in eastern Abkhazia under its de facto jurisdiction. “

    I believe the confusion arises when in the following paragraph I write that the people living in the Gali region are mostly Mingrelian. I should have been more explicit or at least repeated what I had already written. Indeed, I don’t think anyone argues that they are not mostly Mingrelian.

    2. Stalin

    You are right that Stalin did indeed purge the Georgians and many suffered under his reign. I can see how by signaling him out as a Georgian might lead to the impression that he somehow favored Georgia. However, this is your interpretation.

    There is a vibrant debate on the history Abkhazia and Georgia. Your claim that Abkhazia has always been on Georgian territory is both supported and rejected depending on who you ask. As usual, history is contentious.

    3. Russians arming Georgians

    a. According to Human Rights Watch March 1995 report, “Georgia/Abkhazia: Violations of the Laws of War and Russia’s Role in the Conflict.”

    - “In the case of Abkhazia, the Russian role has consisted of affording military and political support now to one side, now to another - thereby, in effect, ‘managing’ the conflict.”

    - “Yet, by supporting, at various times during the conflict, both Georgian and Abkhaz forces, Russia takes a prominent share in the responsibility for the abuses that have been committed, and the consequences of which continue to stare any visitor in the face in the form of refugees, shattered lives, an destroyed property.”

    b. According to an article by Misha Glinny, "The Bear in the Caucasus," Harper's Magazine, March 1994, p. 52.

    -"Inside Georgia itself," one political commentator has noted of the Abkhazia conflict," the Russians have now afforded military and political support to all sides." And, he adds, "only they can mediate a political settlement. Whether they can do so successfully is an open question."

    c. And other sources as well. See further reading at Conciliation Resources, a London based, NGO.

    In particular - Coppieters, B. (ed.) Contested Borders in the Caucasus. VUB Press, Brussels, 1996. Russian version: Spornie Granitsi na Kavkaze. Ves Mir, Moscow, 1996 Electronic version published at http://poli.vub.ac.be/

    There is a passage where it is explicitly stated.

    4. Georgia is bullied by Russia

    I do not dispute this and am aware of the violations committed by Russia.

    I hope this clarifies some of the issues that were raised.

    Kind regards, Nikolaj

  6. Armenian says:

    The world turns back again to bi-polar system as it used to be after WW-2. Whether some people like it or don't. This is the reality. Some go along with "American" model of what they call democracy. Others move towards Russia. All other is just bullshit and political bla-bla-bla. All talks about restoration of constitutional order in Osetia or humanitarian aid for Osetians. This is Caucasus. The strongest becomes respected. This was (and still is) the law in Caucasus.

  7. Russian says:

    In the first I need to agreed with a man which call himself Armenian. And just want to add that if you see through the history back in Caucasus conflicts is a needed think. They cannot live without it. And don't forget - it's a Georgia attack Osetia. History never learns us nothing. P.S. Sorrry if I wrote this incorrectly. I'm just a stupid russia BEAR who drinks VODKA and plays on balalaika. :-)

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

Nikolaj Nielsen's work has appeared on opendemocracy and Pambazuka News websites and in the New Internationalist. Based in France, he has a Master's in Journalism and specialises in war and conflict reporting.

Latest bloggers




URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/blogs/52570/2008/06/15-143724-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org