AFGHANISTAN: ICRC warns of growing humanitarian emergency
Source: IRIN
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
KABUL, 21 October 2007 (IRIN) - Intensifying armed conflict has restricted independent humanitarian access and has caused a complex humanitarian emergency in huge swathes of already
impoverished Afghanistan, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has warned. "We do observe that large areas in the south, the southeast, the east and also growing parts in the west do
see what we would call an emergency situation," Reto Stocker, head of the ICRC delegation in Afghanistan, told IRIN in the Afghan capital, Kabul, on 21 October. This "emergency situation" means
civilians face continuous insecurity and an absence of basic services, while the capacity of state and humanitarian organisations to promptly address these problems is limited, Stocker said. Six
years after the Taliban regime was ousted by a US-led coalition and the international community vowed to rebuild the war-ravaged country, there is a pressing need for neutral and independent
humanitarian intervention to help millions of vulnerable Afghans, aid agencies say. For its part, the ICRC, which mainly provides assistance for conflict-affected civilians, has approved a 30
percent increase in its budget for Afghanistan in 2008, Stocker said. The organisation currently spends about US$35 million on protection, humanitarian relief and medical assistance in battle-affected
areas of the country, which will be increased to over $45 million next year. Radicalisation of views The ICRC's warning comes at a time when the UN has also acknowledged a "considerable" change in
the nature of security incidents in Afghanistan. Contrary to previous wars in Afghanistan, the current armed conflict has had a greater negative impact on independent humanitarian operating space,
aid specialists say. Never before have aid workers been so widely and repeatedly targeted, threatened and restricted by different warring parties during the more than 26 years of armed hostilities
in the country, concede aid agencies with extensive experience in Afghanistan. Aid experts say a radicalisation of views among warring parties; an increased blurring of military and independent
humanitarian lines; and limited adaptability to a changing socio-political environment among some aid agencies are some of the main reasons for Afghanistan's diminishing neutral and impartial
humanitarian space. Attacks on aid workers Overall insurgency-related violence has increased by up to 30 percent in 2007, causing at least 1,100 civilian casualties, the UN Assistance Mission in
Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported on 21 September. [http://wwww.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/AllDocsByUNID/839b9fde94e8f83e85256c62007c5ffa] Intimidation and violence towards humanitarian and development
workers in the country has also increased, the report said, stating that from 1 January to 6 August 2007, 41 humanitarian aid convoys were attacked, 69 humanitarian workers working for various local
and international agencies were abducted (44 national, 25 international), and 41 aid workers were killed (34 national, seven international). As a result, the UN considers one third of Afghanistan's
territory 'inaccessible' and almost half of the country 'high abduction risk areas', making humanitarian access increasingly complex and difficult. "A classic ICRC relief operation in a rural
conflict area would consist of ICRC teams conducting needs assessments, beneficiary identification, aid distribution and a post-distribution assessment," said the ICRC's Reto Stocker. "Because of
security restrictions most of these steps are today no longer possible for our staff. And even our partner, the Afghan Red Crescent Society with its 20,000-volunteers-strong grassroots network,
struggles to deliver basic commodities in certain areas." Finding innovative ways to deliver aid Aid agencies, therefore, have to "find innovative ways" in order to reach vulnerable people and
execute their respective humanitarian obligations, Stocker said. The ICRC seeks to improve accessibility in Afghanistan through regular apolitical dialogue with all warring sides. This worked in
September when a polio immunisation campaign was successfully conducted in volatile southern and south-eastern provinces of the country after the ICRC facilitated direct talks with Taliban insurgents.
As a result, the insurgents agreed to support the UN and the Ministry of Public Health's joint exercise, the ICRC said. For Mat Waldman of Oxfam, however, it is extremely important to keep
humanitarian principles intact when aid organisations approach warring parties for access and safety. "It is entirely right that all agencies operating here seek to expand their operations to the
people who need their assistance, but the important point here is that the aid agencies involved do no compromise the principles of humanitarian assistance: the principles of independence,
impartiality, neutrality and humanity," Waldman said. ad/at/ed© IRIN. All rights reserved. More humanitarian news and analysis: http://www.IRINnews.org










