Tue Dec 19 18:09:50 200617

Fetching...
 
YOU ARE HERE: Homepage > Newsdesk > Article
World's poor still deprived of drugs -activists
14 Nov 2006 00:01:00 GMT
Source: Reuters

A girl queues for anti-tuberculosis drugs at the Blue house clinic, run by medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres, in the Mathare valley slums of Kenya's capital Nairobi.
Previous | Next
A girl queues for anti-tuberculosis drugs at the Blue house clinic, run by medical charity Medecins Sans Frontieres, in the Mathare valley slums of Kenya's capital Nairobi.
REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
LONDON, Nov 14 (Reuters) - Poor people in developing countries are still not getting access to many life-saving medicines five years after a trade declaration that rich countries should put patients before profits, campaigners said on Tuesday.

British-based anti-poverty charity Oxfam and AIDS groups said rich nations were taking little or no action towards meeting their obligations under the "Doha Declaration", leaving millions without affordable drugs.

The World Trade Organisation granted a special exemption in 2001 allowing countries to put public health ahead of patents within its Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement.

But Oxfam said rich countries, particularly the United States, were bullying developing countries to impose stricter patent rules in order to preserve pharmaceutical monopolies.

Health activists say that access to cheap generic drugs is vital if poor countries are going to put up an effective fight against killer diseases such as AIDS and malaria.

"At the time, the Doha Declaration seemed like a great breakthrough for people in poor countries who urgently needed affordable treatment. Sadly, promising words have not translated into life-saving treatments," said Steve Cockburn, Stop AIDS campaign co-ordinator.

The clash over patents in the developing world has focused attention on a couple of high-profile cases including a dispute over the cancer drug Glivec, made by Switzerland's Novartis <NOVN.VX>.

An Indian court in January rejected its patent application for Glivec, but Novartis is fighting back, arguing that the principle of intellectual property protection must be protected if innovation is to flourish.

The ruling has minimal commercial significance because 99 percent of Indian patients are entitled to receive the drug free of charge under a Novartis compassionate use programme.

But Paul Herrling, the company's head of corporate research, told the Reuters Health Summit last week that India risked falling behind China in drug research if it did not shore up its weak patent protection system.
AlertNet news is provided by



Delicio.us  |   Digg  |   NewsVine  |   Reddit                                                                                  Permalink
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2006-12-19T133612Z_01_DEL005_RTRIDSP_2_INDIA_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/DEL005.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2006-12-14T100522Z_01_DEL04_RTRIDSP_2_INDIA-STRIKE_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/DEL04.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2006-12-14T080702Z_01_POY608_RTRIDSP_2_INDIA-BLAST_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/POY608.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2006-12-14T075900Z_01_DEL02_RTRIDSP_2_INDIA-STRIKE_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/DEL02.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2006-12-13T141023Z_01_DEL11_RTRIDSP_2_INDIA-MILITANT-SENTENCE_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/DEL11.htm

Activists from the Socialist Unity Centre of India (SUCI) scuffle with police during a protest in the eastern Indian city of Kolkata December 19, 2006. The protest was held after the charred body of a 19-year-old female was found yesterday morning on farmland acquired by an automobile plant in Singur, local media reported.