Thu Feb 15 15:16:22 200717

Fetching...
 
YOU ARE HERE: Homepage > Newsdesk > Article
U.S. warns North Korea against another nuclear test
05 Jan 2007 23:02:26 GMT
Source: Reuters

(Adds details, North Korea comment, paragraphs 19-20)

By Arshad Mohammed and Paul Eckert

WASHINGTON, Jan 5 (Reuters) - The United States on Friday warned North Korea of "severe consequences" to the diplomatic effort to end its nuclear programs if Pyongyang conducts a second atomic test.

The U.S. State Department issued the warning as U.S. and South Korean officials sought to play down reports that North Korea, which carried out its first nuclear test on Oct. 9, might be preparing for another.

South Korean officials said activity had been spotted near a suspected nuclear test site in North Korea but there was no evidence to suggest Pyongyang was about to test again.

"We do not have any indication that that kind of test is imminent," South Korean Foreign Minister Song Min-soon told reporters after meeting U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

"The North Koreans would have to know that any such test would obviously further deepen their isolation," Rice said.

U.S. officials held out the possibility of a quick resumption of six-party talks on ending North Korea's nuclear ambitions if Pyongyang were to return to the table prepared to carry out its agreement to abandon its nuclear programs.

The talks, which involve the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States, made no visible headway during their last round in Beijing in December.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said there were signs that a fresh round was possible this month but he made clear that a new North Korean nuclear test would be unwelcome.

"If you did have another test of a nuclear device, that would have severe consequences for the viability of that political-diplomatic process -- why would they take such a step at this time?" State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.

RICE SEES SOME PROGRESS

The talks were designed to find a way to carry out a six-party agreement reached on Sept. 19, 2005 in which North Korea said it was committed "to abandoning all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs." In return, the other countries held out economic, political and security incentives.

Despite the failure of the last round, Rice said the parties had made some progress.

"One of the reasons that you are hearing some sense that we might be able to return sooner than later is that when you look at what happened in the last round of the talks, there actually was significant groundwork laid for potential outcomes that could be useful," Rice told a news conference with Song.

"If there are signals that in fact the North is now ready to come back in a more constructive way ... I do think that we could be back in talks fairly soon," she added, but declined to say when that might be.

"It is North Korea's turn to come back to us with a positive and realistic response to the proposals tabled in Beijing," Song added.

North Korea's Oct. 9 nuclear test caused unease across the Pacific and its neighbors, as well as the United States, have been scrutinizing the country for any signs of a new test.

"Certain activities have been detected near a suspected North Korean nuclear test site but currently there are no specific indications related to an additional test," said a South Korean source familiar with the North's nuclear program.

Another South Korean official in Seoul said vehicle and personnel movement had been spotted near the site of the North's first test, Yonhap news agency reported.

That official, however, said there were no signs of cables being laid or electronic monitors being installed which might indicate a test was imminent.

Meanwhile, the unification minister of South Korea -- still technically at war with the communist North half a century after the 1953 Korean War truce -- urged Pyongyang to agree to early summit talks to reduce tensions.

A statement issued by North Korea's official KCNA news agency warned South Koreans if they voted in the conservative opposition in December presidential elections they would stymie cooperation and "impose a nuclear holocaust." (Additional reporting by Jack Kim and Kim Yeon-hee in Seoul)
AlertNet news is provided by

Delicio.us  |   Digg  |   NewsVine  |   Reddit                                                                                  Permalink
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2007-02-15T142250Z_01_BEL03_RTRIDSP_2_SERBIA_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/BEL03.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2007-02-15T094210Z_01_SEO11_RTRIDSP_2_KOREA-NORTH-SUCCESSOR_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/SEO11.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2007-02-15T093612Z_01_SEO12_RTRIDSP_2_KOREA-NORTH-SUCCESSOR_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/SEO12.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2007-02-15T091123Z_01_NYK900_RTRIDSP_2_BURBERRY-PROTEST_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/NYK900.htm
Thumb for /thefacts/imagerepository/RTRPICT/2007-02-14T121829Z_01_LON905_RTRIDSP_2_BURBERRY-PROTEST_mainimage.jpg|/thenews/pictures/LON905.htm

A protester holds banner reading "Russia" during a protest against a U.N. proposal for Kosovo's future in front of the National Assembly building in Belgrade, February 15, 2007. Serbia's newly elected parliament voted late Wednesday against a U.N. plan on the future of its breakaway province of Kosovo as a violation of the country's territorial integrity. U.N. envoy Martti Ahtisaari presented his plan to Belgrade and Pristina on February 2 after almost a year of fruitless negotiations between the two sides.